Friday, July 19, 2013

LIBERTARIANS, THEY'RE LOVIN' IT!

Ah, Megan McArdle is at Bloomberg now. Let's see what she's up to -- oh yeah, that McDonald's how-to-survive-on-our-shitty-pay thing. Guess what, McArdle sides with McDonald's! (Her husband's right, these scripts are getting awfully predictable.)
Moreover, a number of people are claiming that this budget is not merely unkind, but downright Draconian -- “the amounts specified in this budget just aren’t enough to get by, at least not safely,” Irregular Times says. 
This seems overdramatic; $24,000 in after-tax dollars is not princely. But it doesn't put you at significant risk of death or dismemberment. While $800 a month is not a lot to have for clothes, entertainment, groceries and sundries, even taking inflation into account, that was a lot more than the disposable income I had when I first started at The Economist. After student loans, rent and taxes, I had about $300 for everything else, including utilities and MetroCards.
Young career-tracker with a starter job at The Economist, McDonald's employee = pretty much the same thing.
If you are a middle-class professional, and you attempt to imagine replicating your own lifestyle on McDonald's wages, you are bound to feel panic and outrage. But that’s not actually the task facing people who work at McDonald's, or people with a household after-tax income of about $24,000 a year.
Yeah, they're never going to need just the right shoes for a gala reception, so their needs are different.
The McDonald's workforce skews young. The average age of a fast-food worker is almost 30 right now, but that’s because of the recession; in 2000, it was 22. The average McDonald's line worker is not planning to put two kids through college on their salary. Only a minority are trying to support just themselves exclusively on their minimum-wage paycheck; they are living with a spouse or partner who makes at least as much as they do, or with parents or other relatives who make more than minimum wage. Moreover, very few people stay in entry-level minimum-wage jobs for very long (though again, the Great Recession has made this happen more than it used to); those workers eventually get promoted or leave for a more promising job.
Sorry, had to go to the "emphasis added" there; I didn't want you to miss the use of McArdle's  trademarked "the facts support me except for the parts that don't, which I dismiss by naming them" process. Also, funny as I find the idea that shit wages are okay for these people because they can always get their uncle in North Dakota to send them money orders, it's nothing compared to this:
Those who don’t [advance] -- who actually try to support a family on minimum-wage paychecks -- will end up with substantial government support. They’ll get the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Earned Income Tax Credit and, in many places, they will now be eligible for Medicaid.
For one thing, these are programs McArdle's fellow conservatarians are working hard to get rid of. For another and more to the point, this sort of employer exploitation of public assistance is famously what's keeping the whole crap-job paradigm alive. It like defending a con game by saying, "but if you shut it down, how's the con man going to make any money?"

McArdle can't resist adding that you silly elitists can't understand: "There are millions of people in this country doing it," she says. "Keep in mind that most McDonald's workers don’t live close to New York City or Washington... Survival on such a lean budget is possible because people who do it are not trying to live the atomized life of an upper-middle-class college graduate." Woo, that's telling those of us who have our own bathrooms! We get something similar at the Washington Post from McArdle's fellow conservatarian Timothy B. Lee -- but first let me quote my favorite part:
The budget allocates $0 for heat. This could be realistic in some Southern states...
Okay, thanks. Lee has a pot o' sneers for those decadent coastals who insult our fast food slaves by suggesting they could live any differently:
With a couple of exceptions, these are typical figures for the spending of millions of low-income Americans... Gawker’s Neil Casey calls $600 per month for rent a “laughably small” figure, but Casey should spend more time outside the Northeast Corridor... while working two jobs is tough, it’s not that uncommon. About 7 million Americans, or about 5 percent of the workforce, do it... And the reality is that these low-income Americans have to make the kind of hard choices that critics are deriding as ridiculous... Gawker calls the budget “just-shy-of-condescending,” but budgeting is an important skill that isn’t obvious to every young adult in America. Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.
In other words, low-end jobs like these are increasingly long-term propositions, and you're just being insulting by suggesting it's anything but the way things ought to be -- why, it's like asking a harelip for a kiss, or teaching a slave to read!

184 comments:

  1. gocart mozart2:37 PM

    I found this on her wiki page. I'll just leave it here without comment.

    "During her junior year, she worked as a canvasser for the Public Interest Research Groups, the nonprofit founded by Ralph Nader. Her experience there hurried along her “transition from ultraliberal to libertarian.” The organization was, she later wrote, “the most deceptive, evil place I've ever worked."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.

    Advocating for raising the minimum wage, or attempting to pressure McDonald's to simply fucking pay people more, on the other hand, is an abridgement of Liberty Itself. So I guess I can see why a spoiled little libertarian shit would choose to construct such an enormous strawman instead.

    ReplyDelete
  3. merl12:48 PM

    I'd like to know which Southern state you can live in and not need heat. I froze my ass off in Florida more than once, same in Mississippi, Texas and Louisiana. I didn't stick around Georgia long enough to get cold.
    Even in Arizona I got pretty damn cold at least twice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And the reality is that these low-income Americans have to make the kind
    of hard choices that critics are deriding as ridiculous...


    Actually, I'm deriding as monstrous the fact that people are being forced into those choices by rapacious capitalists, Timmy. "How dare you mock the lower-class slobs who clearly know their place" isn't actually a refutation of that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.


    Advocating for an increased minimum wage, or even pressuring McDonald's to fucking pay people more, however, is an abridgement of Liberty Itself. So I guess I can see why a spoiled little libertarian shit would prefer to construct an enormous strawman stuck together with bull manure instead.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Felchin' Disqus.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr. Wonderful2:59 PM

    Sub-minimum wage workers should be glad they have any job at all. Look, we're all suffering. Corporate profits are down. The stock market has tanked and, every day, struggles to even breathe. CEO and executive pay has been drastically cut. The market is cruel, yes, but it's cruel evenhandedly, across the board.

    Granted, if chief exex who--to confect a ludicrous hypothetical--ran companies into bankruptcy, or oversaw multi-million-dollar losses, were to walk away with eight-figure severance or retirement packages, that would be galling and unacceptable, of course. But does that happen? And is Megan McArdle not Marie of Romania?


    Fair is fair and, thankfully, we live under capitalism, which is an anagram for "an honest day's pay for an honest day's work--for everyone."

    ReplyDelete
  8. ohsopolite3:00 PM

    "I had about $300 for everything else, including utilities and MetroCards."

    Obviously Meeeeegan is descending into (slightly) premature codgerhood. *in my day, we were happy, HAPPY I tell you to have $300 a month. A loaf of bread cost a quarter, and cabfare was as nickel, consarn it!"

    ReplyDelete
  9. marindenver3:03 PM

    I saw somewhere that a big purpose of the budget website was to convince workers of the awesomeness of paycheck debit cards. Funny, I don't see where they factored in all the fees that the employees get jacked for every time they use these wonderful, handy, dandy cards.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mr. Wonderful3:06 PM

    We used to DREAM of having a MetroCard. No, we had to carry around actual metal coins in our pockets and purses, and use them to board noisy, graffiti-covered trains without air conditioning. Ah, but we were happy...

    ReplyDelete
  11. gocart mozart3:07 PM

    The economy in its infinite majesty allows both rich and poor to purchase pink Himalayan Salt.

    ReplyDelete
  12. tigrismus3:10 PM

    Gave me the chance to like it twice.

    ReplyDelete
  13. TribalistMeathead3:11 PM

    It gets worse - as noted thoroughly at LGM, the "what's the matter with teaching people how to budget?" rebuttal is being used across the ideological spectrum.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hey, that's right.


    [Triumphantly wallows in bitcoins]

    ReplyDelete
  15. TribalistMeathead3:16 PM

    Canvassing for Nader would probably have the same effect on me. Which is why I'm never canvassing for Nader.

    ReplyDelete
  16. TribalistMeathead3:18 PM

    Think of all the ridicule they could've avoided by putting "Heat - $0 (electric heating/radial heat not charged to tenant/whateverthefuck)," or not putting it on there to begin with.

    ReplyDelete
  17. tigrismus3:27 PM

    After student loans, rent and taxes, I had about $300 for everything else, including utilities and MetroCards.

    I note taxes aren't included in the linked budget, nor are student loans nor MetroCards. Perhaps McDonald workers are exempt from these costs, like they are for heat.

    Keep in mind that most McDonald's workers don’t live close to New York City or Washington

    I'm sure that knowledge provides some comfort for the thousands that do.


    Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.

    Okay, here's some for FREE: to be useful, a budget needs to have some link to reality.

    ReplyDelete
  18. tigrismus3:29 PM

    Pshaw, she didn't need any help to become deceptive and evil.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Matt Jones3:33 PM

    One wonders if McMegan is in on the "go long on pitchfork and torch manufacturers" hedge fund like this guy:

    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/09/2271841/wsj-homeless-people/

    ReplyDelete
  20. BigHank533:37 PM

    Tell me more about this felching-for-bitcoins. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    ReplyDelete
  21. BigHank533:40 PM

    Trust McArdle to throw out the baby along with the bathwater, then blame the people who told her that washing the kid was a good idea in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  22. TribalistMeathead3:40 PM

    Like many libertarians, all she needed was a father who got rich off of government contracts.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Jay B.3:40 PM

    I'm torn between rooting for the meteor or the inevitable Year Zero program. Because we SUCK as human beings.

    ReplyDelete
  24. tigrismus3:41 PM

    Yeesh, sounds like the guy is using the WSJ as the biggest megaphone ever to publicly mock his own son. Can't imagine why the son hasn't followed in pop's footsteps.

    ReplyDelete
  25. commie atheist3:46 PM

    Math, in its infinite majesty, allows both the rich and poor to budget for their roughly equivalent income and expenses.

    ReplyDelete
  26. verplanck3:48 PM

    note that in McMegan's budget, food isn't included. must have lived off 50-lb sacks of rice and beans.

    ReplyDelete
  27. verplanck3:51 PM

    I tried the PIRG canvassing gig myself, and would call it soul-sucking, boring and tiring. I was never cut out to do a sales pitch, let alone door-to-door sales pitches. However, I was able to dissociate the shittyness of the job from the issues they were advocating for (in my case, neighbor notification of pesticide application).

    ReplyDelete
  28. LookWhosInTheFreezer3:59 PM

    "while working two jobs slavery is tough, it’s not that uncommon."

    ReplyDelete
  29. tigrismus3:59 PM

    Yeah, I noticed that food and clothes are to be taken out of the surfeit of disposable income(or maybe it's the "other"?). I also noticed if you subtract out the second job, the McD's job alone won't cover the already meager projected spending.

    ReplyDelete
  30. tigrismus4:03 PM

    Or maybe they expect workers to provide themselves with "food" from work? It's not theft if it's baked into your salary!

    ReplyDelete
  31. willf4:19 PM

    I thought liberals were agin notions of punishing a whole people for the actions of a few.

    I know this is gonna get me downvoted but I have to say it.

    The "where is our giant space meteor?" trope is the same thing as Xians wanting an apocalypse to kill off all the unrighteous -- with the exception that Xians think they will survive the apocalypse, and (some) liberals want everyone to die by meteor.

    I mean, I know, I know "It's just a joke". But a revealing one.

    ReplyDelete
  32. willf4:21 PM

    Ah yes, "throwing the baby out w/ the bathwater", that's the "giant meteor" joke in a nutshell.

    ReplyDelete
  33. willf4:23 PM

    RIght, I wondered if McGargle saw no difference between 800$ back when she was starting out, and $800 today.


    But I guess it wasn't central to her point so she ignored it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Of course, the $24k per year figure is factoring a second full time and less lucrative (!!) job, which itself is just good old McArdle style hand waving and figure conjuring. Unless McDonalds is also a placement agency now.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Derelict4:43 PM

    And that's why having only $300 leftover in her paycheck was no big deal. With daddy helping out, she could have had zero leftover and STILL maintained her hobby torturing slugs with pink salt.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Derelict4:50 PM

    On the whole, the McDonalds budget exercise has been very revealing about how lots of folks view the world. Many seem to fall into the camp of, "Well, people stuck working at min-wage jobs are stupid, and the only way to help them is to teach them budgeting skills." As though someone scratching out a living on minimum wage isn't already acutely aware of every dime they have and where it goes.
    And then there are those who seem to think that helping min-wage workers by raising the minimum wage to something more livable is too politically difficult, so it's not even worth considering, much less trying. Instead, we'll just built fantasy camps in our heads where being poor isn't all that bad--or being poor is a just punishment for being poor.
    And, finally, there are those of us who have been poor, and who know what it means to try to survive on nothing. We have that all-too-rare quality called empathy. And we'd like to help the poor by making the most profitable companies on the face of the Earth pay their employees a living wage--something that would not only benefit those employees, but would also benefit the companies in question over the longer term.

    ReplyDelete
  37. marindenver4:56 PM

    OK, I'll bite. Revealing of what?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Jay B.4:59 PM

    Actions of a few? Our society is manifestly unjust and its people are, in large part, unspeakably cruel. Our corporate masters suggest to their underpaid employees how to spend their money without including "heat" as an expense while adding in the income of a second job. We have an endless amount of people, conservative and "progressive" who think that's a noble endeavor. You're worried about a facetious comment -- which isn't ACTUALLY BASED IN A DOGMATIC BELIEF SYSTEM -- while ignoring the actual and larger point I was trying to make about the gamed society in which we live.

    But, for the record, I don't want a meteor and I ALSO don't think Irish babies would make a good meal, just so you don't worry.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Every time someone glibly assumes that someone is eligible for SNAP, my head wants to explode! SNAP eligibility isn't hidden in a rune; there are charts available online. A quick look at one will tell you that, no someone making $24,000 per year isn't eligible for SNAP. Two people making that income aren't eligible. The limit for three people in Virginia, where I live, is $24, 828.00 which is the same for New York (I checked). A three person family earning $24,000.00 would probably receive about $20.00 per month. One person earning zero dollars in income receives $200.00 per month and two people with zero income receive $376.00.

    This is what these sociopaths in the Republican party want to cut. Bear in mind that you need a qualifying child to get any real money from the EITC; adults can receive the credit but the maximum for 2012 was $475.00. How do I know this? I checked. Like the food stamp information, the information is available online: http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/EITC-Income-Limits,-Maximum-Credit--Amounts-and-Tax-Law-Updates

    ReplyDelete
  40. Jay B.5:02 PM

    Did a giant meteor threaten you or something? Were you thrown out with the bathwater as a child? How are these the same things? I'm curious because you were outraged at my meteor post earlier and now are tying it in to a different trope.

    ReplyDelete
  41. willf5:03 PM

    Revealing of the fact that they have this weird desire to see the whole thing go blooey.

    It's funny, I always thought that we wanted to make the world better, or at least not make it worse, but some apparently want the Earth to be destroyed because people suck.



    It it just seems so... "non-liberal" to want the whole thing to end just because there exist people who are assholes.


    Instead of "People are assholes, so the world should end" can't we turn it to "People are assholes, so let's try to correct for that"?

    ReplyDelete
  42. willf5:10 PM

    I'm not actually worried about your facetious comment, I just think it's odd to joke about the planet being destroyed when you don't like the people at the top?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Dr. Hunky Jimpjorps5:11 PM

    Sometimes people say things that are exaggerated for effect. It's a common literary trope called "hyperbole", similar to the way I'm exaggeratedly explaining what hyperbole is.

    ReplyDelete
  44. willf5:12 PM

    It's not outrage, merely bemusement or bewilderment?

    You'd know if it was outrage, cuz there'd be more swearing.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Not to mention, budgeting for lawyers to cover up for blowing up the economy.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  46. As usual, Roy is hating on librarians.


    What did books do to you, Roy???
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  47. mgmonklewis5:31 PM

    We were evicted from our hole in the ground. We had to go live in a lake.

    ReplyDelete
  48. BigHank535:31 PM

    Uh, it's a proverb that dates back at least 500 years:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Throw_out_the_baby_with_the_bath_water

    Whereas rooting for the giant meteor is pretty clearly black comedy:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_humor


    One of these things is not like the other. Links included because you seem to enjoy jumping to conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Jay B.5:34 PM

    Instead of "People are assholes, so the world should end" can't we turn it to "People are assholes, so let's try to correct for that"?



    So the Year Zero approach. Why are you in favor of re-education camps and genocide?! [Faint]


    Or, you know, it's also just possible that its a "metaphor", not literal, but rather a symbolic way to try and explain that maybe it'd be best to start over in some way.


    You know, when a wealthy, hack columnist who writes for the billionaire mayor of New York's business magazine defends the miserly, faux-caring, odiously paternalistic approach to poverty...there's nothing really OK about that. It's sickening in every way. I do sometimes think that we, as a society are too far gone to give a shit, really, just how wrong it is. Instead we bitch about "tone" or "civility" or focus on the kind of fake, plainly stupid concerns you have about what I wrote — or whether crackpots think the righteous will remain while every one else burns — as opposed to the real and actual horrors around us.


    I'm sure you care deeply about "fixing" and "helping", but it gets dispiriting that volunteering, donating and voting really only goes so far, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  50. mgmonklewis5:34 PM

    Why use hyperbole when instead one can use Contrarianism, Holier-than-Thou-ism, Straw Men, and Bathos? (Not you, obviously; Willfy.)

    ReplyDelete
  51. mgmonklewis5:35 PM

    So if the joke-teller employing hyperbole punched down instead of up, the joke would be fine?
    Humor, how does it work?

    ReplyDelete
  52. mgmonklewis5:38 PM

    Figures of speech, how do they work?

    ReplyDelete
  53. harumph6:11 PM

    Apparently she also doesn't see any difference between $750 today and $800 today. The graphic clearly says $750, but she just blatantly rounds that up to $800 in order to bolster her idiotic argument.

    ReplyDelete
  54. ADHDJ6:13 PM

    "Why do you keep hitting yourself?"

    ReplyDelete
  55. harumph6:13 PM

    She's an idiot. She thinks winter doesn't exist in the South because she's never been there.

    ReplyDelete
  56. XeckyGilchrist6:36 PM

    For one thing, these are programs McArdle's fellow conservatarians are working hard to get rid of.


    Yeah, that reminded me of Romney's campaign-trail yap of "there'll always be the safety net."

    ReplyDelete
  57. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard7:00 PM

    "Let them eat quarter-pounders!"

    ReplyDelete
  58. Gromet7:00 PM

    A while ago I started to wonder -- why don't we encourage companies to link the salaries of their highest- and lowest-paid employees? Maybe give any company a big fat tax break that yolked pay into a ratio, such that (say) the CEO could make at most 40 times as much as the guy on the bottom wrung. So if Starbucks is paying $6/hr to its barristas, it can pay... (math...) $499,200 to its CEO. It's easy to live on half a mil -- who could complain they were being robbed there? And this would grow the middle class, stabilize home prices, secure investment banks -- as far as I can tell, it would make our overall economy/nation stronger, and it certainly would take us back to boss/worker pay ratios more in tune with the ones in the US in the 1950s, which are obviously THE cultural gold standard to conservatives. So I can't see who'd complain... except the nation's CEOs? A fairly small number of voters, with essentially a selfish position...

    I'm obviously a crackpot. But a 40:1 ratio -- or 50:1, or even 100:1 -- would be better for us than what we've got now. What's the argument against it?

    ReplyDelete
  59. I did similar work for Tom Hayden's group back in 1985. The pay was probably too low, and they depended on morale substituting for livable wages, but it was an interesting experience for someone with some skills as a salesman as I am.


    I got to see Jane Fonda and Margo Kidder close-up at a conference in LA.


    I amazed my fellow workers by talking to the latter for the few minutes it took to walk to the bus she was looking for. "Right over here, Ms. Kidder", and she turned and we chatted until she reached her transportation.


    Good times, good times.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard7:01 PM

    While $800 a month is not a lot to have for clothes, entertainment, groceries and sundries, even taking inflation into account, that was a lot more than the disposable income I had when I first started at The Economist.


    It also helps to have a dad who sucked a lot of cash from the government teat.

    ReplyDelete
  61. montag27:13 PM

    Oh, silly me. I should have known that MeMeMeMeMeMeMeMegan would weigh in on this Ronald McDonald hand job and defend it.

    After all, it's not only condescending, it's just more marketing horseshit. (I really want to see any one of MickeyD's marketing whizzes live on those hours and that take-home for, say, a year. With a crappy car (which is what you get for $150 a month and likely no down payment) and paying the sitter, and all the other emergencies that the working poor have no way of preparing for or defending against.)

    That exercise was nothing more than a con job. It's not our fault we pay you shit wages! You just need to manage those shit wages better! Hey, let's see if we can demoralize the help even more than we do with our soul-sucking, part-time shit work selling shitty food! Well, hell, they are serfs!



    Thirty years ago, someone should have beaten Ray Kroc about the head and shoulders with a giant bag of frozen hamburger patties for a couple of hours and, maybe, just maybe, he would have gotten the message when it counted.



    But, nobody did, and, look, now we have to beat MeMeMeMeMeMeMegan with a giant bag of pink Himalayan salt. Ignore a small problem and it will grow into a much bigger one.

    ReplyDelete
  62. It's easy to live on half a mil -- who could complain they were being robbed there?

    All those people who repeatedly complain about how it's almost impossible to get by on a quarter of a mil? The hordes who denounced the top marginal federal income tax rate going back up a couple of percentage points as equivalent to the Holocaust? Right-libertarians?

    What's the argument against it?


    Freedom. Jesus didn't found America and part the Red Tea down at the harbor so that Big Government could grab all the Makers' hard-earned money and hand it to a bunch of darkie thugs in gold-plated diapers.

    ReplyDelete
  63. LookWhosInTheFreezer7:50 PM

    The argument against it is: "Socialist!!" followed by some sort of trickle-down mumbo-jumbo with a heavy use of the words moocher, boot-straps and Hayek.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Gromet7:51 PM

    You are correct -- these are the arguments against it!

    "What's my incentive to go to business school, work hard, and be a genius if the most I can get is complete comfort for myself and my family??" -- the hordes

    ReplyDelete
  65. Gromet7:55 PM

    Argh, you're right! I keep forgetting two things!
    1) Every kid flipping burgers today, if he just works hard enough, will become CEO before he dies.
    2) We're not all in this together.


    Even so, I'ma gonna stick to my crackpot idea!

    ReplyDelete
  66. DocAmazing8:08 PM

    Proposal: Salary caps for executives in any corporation receiving any government money, including space at military bases.


    If salary caps for athletes can be taken seriously, salary caps for necktie-wearing goofs who can't even sink a bucket should be no challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  67. DocAmazing8:16 PM

    You jest, but back in my teen years I had a friend who worked at Mickey D's and was fired and threatened with arrest for eating a burger that a drive-through customer decided she didn't want.


    They won't feed you, and they won't pay you enough to feed yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  68. DocAmazing8:17 PM

    being poor is a just punishment for being poor


    That sums up the corporate worldview beautifully. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Dear Socialist Worker:

    I never thought this would happen to me, but there I was, tied down by my own boot straps, as Salma Hayek prepared to mooch me all over. Whew, I'm trickling down again just thinking about it. Anyway, it all started with a cab ride to McDonald's ...

    ReplyDelete
  70. In fairness, if your friend had simply waited until it ended up in the dumpster, it probably would have been okay.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Ah, but what if the bucket is a metaphor for the global economy, smart guy?

    ReplyDelete
  72. tigrismus9:16 PM

    LOOXURY. A lake is a hole with plumbing.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard10:06 PM

    I've never viewed it as such. For me, the "where is the meteor" trope is a wry acknowledgment that we ourselves are responsible for an extinction event that will rival the K-T extinction event, while the dinosaurs that we deride as dumb brutes, destined for extinction, were innocent of blame. We have been in the midst of a mass extinction event, for which we are largely responsible, for the last 10,000 years. We are now at the point that we may be one of the species that will die off.


    We are our own giant meteor.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Halloween_Jack10:12 PM

    There's this fellow named Jonathan Swift who wrote a decent fantasy book that you might want to read; please pay particular attention to the ending. If that doesn't help you get it, then by all means feel free to join my elderly aunt in forwarding every fucking picture of a cute dog on the internet to your Facebook feed.

    ReplyDelete
  75. i want to felch this comment.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard10:16 PM

    Is this a reference to Rev. Fred Felch of Westboro Baptist Church?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Halloween_Jack10:16 PM

    I don't want to contemplate what MegMac shat out recently because I'm in a pretty good headspace right now, and I think that I'd like to keep it, maybe by playing Mass Effect, rather than by dwelling on the knowledge that she's so sadly predictable in her smugness and glibertarianism that I could practically write the fucking thing myself, and if that ain't gazing into the ol' abyss... Instead, since Roy linked to it, I'll snark a wee bit on Mr. McArdle's stunning revelation that Hollywood tends to be formulaic and self-imitative when it comes to blockbusters. Have a peep, it's quite precious.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard10:18 PM

    I'm in a pretty good headspace right now, and I think that I'd like to keep it, maybe by playing Mass Effect


    I shall ruin your fun by referring to the game as MacEffect. You will now see blue-skinned alien McArdles throughout your play-through of the game.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard10:19 PM

    I don't think she rounded it up to bolster her argument, I think she's just horrible at math and screwed up.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Halloween_Jack10:22 PM

    Not a chance. She's a human vorcha if ever there was.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Fats Durston10:25 PM

    So, many of these numbers don’t seem wildly unreasonable to me. The
    health-care line item [20$/month] obviously doesn't cover insurance or major medical problems; presumably, they’re assuming that you’re a young worker who maybe buys birth control or pays $100 to go to the doctor once or twice a
    year.


    First, assume a spherical cow-orker.

    Fucking Christ, how many fucking people who work more than sixty fucking hours a fucking week and eat McDonald's throw-outs to survive are fucking healthy? One or two medicines a year are not "wildly unreasonable" in a society that has discussed publicly for the last fucking decade about how health care costs have ballooned catastrophically? Which'll it be, this month, penicillin or birth control, poor person? Choose wisely now.



    Fuck you, McMegan, you fucking evil fuck.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Spaghetti Lee10:38 PM

    But most athletes are, well, you know, urban.


    Actually, the weird thing about sports media is that there's a vocal contingent of people (Gregg Easterbrook and Colin Cowherd are two prominent examples) who are forever ragging on athletes for being rich, questioning their financial decisions, deriding them for being too materialistic, and so forth. Now, in context, it's mostly a bunch of racial dog-whistling, but still, wouldn't it be swell if our business and finance media had a similar attitude?

    ReplyDelete
  83. Spaghetti Lee10:43 PM

    Honestly, Will may be overreacting, but I think he's got a point. At the very least, I roll my eyes when I hear people spend all election season complaining about poor white people 'voting against their own best interests!' while spending all of not-election season calling them morons, hicks, and goobers. That 'liberal elitist' meme, dumb as it is, has hung around so long for a reason.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Spaghetti Lee10:54 PM

    Survival on such a lean budget is possible because people who do it are not trying to live the atomized life of an upper-middle-class college
    graduate.


    People who get paid like shit don't have upper-middle-class lifestyles? Lordy lordy! This is why she gets paid the big bucks, people, and why you all don't deserve anything more than McDonalds' wages!


    McArdle does this a lot, I've noticed: play on the insecurity that her upper class, well-off audience (I mean, you know, it's Bloomberg Business) has about their privilege and their possible concern for the less fortunate. McArdle, like Brooks, apparently thinks it's her job to squash such concern by subtly assuring those people that the poor are practically a different species who don't even have the same wants and needs. She turns concern for the downtrodden into something that should be avoided, as if it were a moral failing. It's like evil, opposite-day consciousness raising.



    You know, there's a word for people who have awful jobs and no prospect of future advancement, in part because they don't have education or credentials, and in part because the people who could help them don't consider them important enough to bother with. It's called a permanent underclass. Wage slave if you're feeling less euphemistic. Libertarians, of course, see the creation of such a class as right and necessary-who else will serve the Creatives in their castles?-which is why their first reaction to people getting paid $24,000 a year isn't "Oh God, that's awful" but "we've got them right where we want them.

    ReplyDelete
  85. BigHank5310:55 PM

    Never mind that fact that (a) McDonald's will keep your on a part-time schedule forever, so they don't ever have to pay benefits, and (b) they'll shift your hours around so much you'd never be able to keep working that second job.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Fats Durston11:07 PM

    The same woman who recommends the Thermomix on the xmas gift list, a machine which costs more than the annual savings projected by McDonald's "budget".

    ReplyDelete
  87. Jay B.11:23 PM

    It's an odd critique to use in a post and thread dedicated to the fact that our overclass is idiotsplaining how budgets work to people who have to work two minimum wages jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Spaghetti Lee11:36 PM

    I think it's a parallel to the "If you need a job, there's always the North Dakota oil boom." argument. If you can't afford your heating bill, just move to Key West and find work there!

    ReplyDelete
  89. billcinsd11:53 PM

    probably some more calculator problems. You know once they get gastritis they never go back

    ReplyDelete
  90. Jimcima12:56 AM

    Yes, the twice a year $100 doctor appointment is amazing bullshit. Because a doctor would never have you come back for a follow-up or order any tests or prescribe a medication - no, he waves his magic doctor wand and heals you on the spot.

    And of course in reality land if you went to the doctor twice a year and he essentially tells you "you're OK, it will go away on it's own" every time how many of these $100 appointments would you continue to schedule? If you are a budget savvy poor person (like the cons demand you to be) and you need to decide between a useless doctor's appointment and some other actual need what exactly do they want you to do?

    ReplyDelete
  91. Another Kiwi1:46 AM

    McArdle has seen the map of maccas as volcanos? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/09/map-every-mcdonalds-us_n_1084045.html

    Quite a lot of them are in big cities. To quote the map compiler Von Worley observes, "McDonald's cluster at the population centers and hug the highway grid."

    ReplyDelete
  92. marindenver2:00 AM

    Assuming you took freshman composition, did they ever explain the term "metaphor"?

    ReplyDelete
  93. redoubt2:09 AM

    They won't feed you, and they won't pay you enough to feed yourself.


    Yes, this. (From experience. Later at Pizza Hut, I was surprised I was actually allowed to eat.)

    ReplyDelete
  94. Waffle_Man2:14 AM

    Why look things up when you can just make glib assumptions?

    I mean, it's not like McArdle gets paid for this. Right? RIGHT???

    ReplyDelete
  95. AGoodQuestion2:17 AM

    Guess someone granted her permission to suck again.

    ReplyDelete
  96. AGoodQuestion2:22 AM

    Yes, a coddled conservatarian is making money for telling everyone that fast food workers don't need any more money. Alanis Morrissette wrote a song about it called, "Fuck Irony, That Just Sucks."

    ReplyDelete
  97. willf2:42 AM

    We are our own giant meteor.



    Oh. Ok.

    ReplyDelete
  98. willf2:48 AM

    Damn did I NOT mean to start a blog flame war, I just wanted to point out something I thought was weird.

    So the Year Zero approach. Why are you in favor of re-education camps and genocide?!

    Didn't advocate for that but whatever.

    No I mean, I think McArful is a horrible person too.

    I do sometimes think that we, as a society are too far gone to give a shit, really, just how wrong it is.

    So you were serious?

    ReplyDelete
  99. willf2:53 AM

    So Swift was trying to jolt people into thinking about things differently then they had. Swift was, in effect, making fun of the very things that are featured in McArful's post.

    Curious, how is the giant meteor joke like Swift? What is it satirizing?

    ReplyDelete
  100. willf2:56 AM

    I think that's my line, here.

    ReplyDelete
  101. horatius4:01 AM

    Who's we motherfucker?

    ReplyDelete
  102. BadExampleMan4:54 AM

    I did similar work for the Citizen Action network in the early '80s. Fundraising by canvass was an attempt to develop a model of progressive activism that could be financially self-sustaining (canvassers were basically paid on comission, 40% of what we raised with a weekly minimum you had to make to keep your job) and responsible/responsive to the general public (if they didn't like what you were doing/promising to do, they wouldn't give you money).

    We worked mostly on utility rate reform and neighborhood-level environmental issues like brownfields. It was rewarding work but extremely stressful and the turnover rate was ridiculously high. There weren't enough other positions for canvassers to move into when they (inevitably) burned out on the grind of having to raise X dollars every night. So to that extent the experiment was a failure; we spent a tremendous amount of time and energy training people in public speaking, neighborhood organizing, fundraising, and issue awareness only to have them leave after three months or six months or a year because there was nowhere else in the organization we could put their skills to use.

    ReplyDelete
  103. nanute5:04 AM

    With company provided debit cards! And don't forget to add the fromundercheese; no extra charge.

    ReplyDelete
  104. toc0019:58 AM

    $0 for heat in Southern States, but $100's for air conditioning or the electricity for several fans and a refrigerator working overtime in a hot apartment. But don't worry, the elitists can opt to pay an extra $1 on their electric bill to help you out or suck up and take the nano second of guilt when they ignore that check box. Hell, if they're on auto-pay, they don't even see it.

    ReplyDelete
  105. montag210:11 AM

    Oh, one way or another, the gummint pays for the lawyers. Legal fees are, of course, one of those externalities to be sloughed off on the taxpayers whenever possible.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Halloween_Jack11:03 AM

    I was pointing you specifically toward the end of Gulliver's Travels, which features some of the same misanthropy that you seem to decry so vigorously. Sometimes, misanthropy is justified, when people are especially shitty toward one another.

    ReplyDelete
  107. reallyaimai11:08 AM

    I'm surprised that the alicuratti missed the amazing torture shout out embedded in this McInsight piece (stolen from a baloon juice commenter,btw) --she implicitly excuses us from needing to be concerned about poverty because it "doesn't produce organ failure" or desth. That was the bush era bright line between what we are permitted to do to our prisoners and what we might have to feel slightly ashamed of having done. She is jokingly linking the oppression of starvation wages and abusive work practices to torture to make capitalism look better. It's classic mcmegan. Hyperbole in the service of servility is no vice.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Excellent comment. Also, I have to point out... there are those of us who have never been poor, but we still have empathy for the poor... because we aren't authoritarians, nor are we delusional fucking libertarians.

    ReplyDelete
  109. BG, ribbons in my hair11:58 AM

    How much you want to bet she had an expense account when she started at The Economist?

    ReplyDelete
  110. glennisw12:01 PM

    "Keep in mind that most McDonald's workers don’t live close to New York City or Washington..." Oh, hell, no they're not! They're taking the train in from Flushing or Inwood to work that shitty job at the Mickey-D's on 6th Avenue in the Village.

    ReplyDelete
  111. glennisw12:03 PM

    "Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so."


    The thing that kills me about this is that people who live on a modest income (aka The Poors) already have quite a lot of expertise in managing their budgets - probably far more expertise than McMegan has. For them, it's a matter of survival, and drawing out their pittance to the end of the month is something that's on their minds all the time. They'd probably have a lot to teach her.

    ReplyDelete
  112. glennisw12:07 PM

    That, and when the wage slaves choose to spend a little of their money on amusement or pleasure - a TV bought on credit, a manicure, or god forbid, a six pack of beer - the McMegan class chastises them for the indulgence. Christ, even the scullerymaid gets one day off a week so she can stroll up 5th Avenue and walk in the park, but look, look, she has a cell phone!

    ReplyDelete
  113. RogerAiles12:11 PM

    $800 a month. Isn't that what McArdle spends on batteries?

    ReplyDelete
  114. glennisw12:12 PM

    And don't forget to amend The Poors Budget to include the cost of your state-mandated drug testing, which is required to receive the benefit.

    ReplyDelete
  115. KatWillow12:18 PM

    I thought liberals were agin notions of punishing a whole people for the actions of a few


    STRAW man. Where did you get that "idea"?

    ReplyDelete
  116. BG, ribbons in my hair12:29 PM

    McArdle was born and raised in a VERY COMFORTABLE home. If she ever really needed money, I'm sure mummy and deddy would have been there to help out:


    McArdle was born and raised in New York City. Her father, Francis X. McArdle, was former managing director of the GCA (General Contractors Association of New York)[5] during the Koch, Dinkins, and Giuliani administrations. Her mother, Joan McArdle, was a real estate broker for Prudential Douglas Elliman.[6]

    She has an undergraduate degree in English Literature from the University of Pennsylvania.

    During her junior year, she worked as a canvasser for the Public Interest Research Groups, the nonprofit founded by Ralph Nader. Her experience there hurried along her “transition from ultraliberal to libertarian.” The organization was, she later wrote, “the most deceptive, evil place I've ever worked.”[7] She earned an MBA from University of Chicago's Booth School of Business.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Jimcima12:30 PM

    It amazing McDonald's the giant multinational megacoporation doesn't have better accountants. If you wanted to give budget advice to the very poor shouldn't you inform them of tax regulations that would give them a significant government benefit like the Earned Income Tax credit?

    Why, it's almost like they don't want the them to take advantage of these regulations so that they had to have two low-paying jobs so McDonald's could maintain a vast pool of poor and desperate workers to exploit.

    ReplyDelete
  118. BG, ribbons in my hair12:30 PM

    Maybe she has one that plugs into the wall.

    ReplyDelete
  119. arcadesproject12:50 PM

    Is it an abridgment of Liberty Itself to pressure people to pay employees less?

    ReplyDelete
  120. fraser12:58 PM

    Libertarian/Repub sock-puppet Ron Hart ran a column about how all tacky rich people (like rap stars and people who wear gold chains ... I think he was making some sort of point) are Democrats and classy rich people are obviously Republicans.

    ReplyDelete
  121. whetstone12:59 PM

    Offering practical advice on how to live on a modest income is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.

    I'd missed this when I read Lee's thing before, but it's absolutely exquisite, and I will use it whenever labor issues rear their head: "Offering practical advice on how to live with black lung is more constructive than ridiculing the choices required to do so.."

    ReplyDelete
  122. cwaltz1:06 PM

    What amuses me most about this pack is they are the first to scream that if these people want better than a minimum wage than they should get educated. They're also the loudest for screaming and hollering that students shouldn't go into debt without knowing whether or not they'll have the means to pay it back. So what I've been asking forever and a day is HOW THE FRACK ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO GET EDUCATED?- you want them to work 80 hour work weeks and even then after a year a minimum wage earner is barely going to be able to afford community college.

    Even in my area, a minimum wage earner can't get ahead(and I don't like in a metro)

    Income: 1100 a month for full time

    Rent (studio that includes heat and utilities) 390

    Food 160 (USDA thrifty plan)

    Internet/phone 100

    utilites 0 (included in rent)

    heat 0 (included in rent)

    other (clothing, shampoo, detergent) 80

    medical/dental 150 (assumes fine and 120 in rolling costs to cover dr vist or dental visit for cleanings)

    Savings (10% of income) 110
    Transportation 0 (you can't afford a car or insurance on your income-you'll need to walk for a couple years so you can buy a car outright and get liability- and when you do there goes the discretionary income)
    That leaves $100 in discretionary income. If you save that over a couple years you might be lucky enough to choose between a car or school. Whoopie!

    ReplyDelete
  123. TGuerrant1:07 PM

    lulz... you do standup willfy?

    ReplyDelete
  124. cwaltz1:08 PM

    The Subway near us fired someone for taking the cookies at the end of the day instead of throwing them away. Some bosses are pricks I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  125. TGuerrant1:10 PM

    I think that comes with hash marks, like:


    Idiots' "logical" spectrum

    ReplyDelete
  126. McBargle describes her trip to VA theme parks

    Almost none of those days, however, was spent standing in line. Being roller-coaster fans with an economic turn of mind, we were very excited to learn that both Busch Gardens and Kings Dominion offered customers the opportunity to jump the queue, for a price ranging from $20 per person (at Water Country USA, the Busch Gardens water park) to $55 for the roller coasters. This is real money, of course, but it wasn’t prohibitive; it was less than we were spending on hotels and food, or for that matter, the theme park tickets.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-18/roller-coasters-for-the-rich.html

    ReplyDelete
  127. TGuerrant1:14 PM

    Yaz. Iz much nicer than just saying, "Suck it up, loser."

    ReplyDelete
  128. whetstone1:19 PM

    With a crappy car (which is what you get for $150 a month and likely no down payment)


    The clearest lesson about the economics of poverty I've ever heard is the Bottle Rockets' "$1000 Car": "Sink your money in it, and there you are/the proud owner of a two-thousand-dollar thousand-dollar car."

    ReplyDelete
  129. TGuerrant1:20 PM

    And there were always the parental units.


    My fellow "poor students" got magnanimous deliveries of ancestral attic furniture when they busted out of the dorms and were challenged to find a working-enough-fridge they could put on the back porch for the food deliveries mom ordered for them during class hours/drunk elsewhere hours.


    Some of them even had cleaning crews supplied, plus bought-on-holidays wardrobes and charge-at-will family credit cards.


    It was cute for the family's holiday newsletter when they got rough and tumble joblettes -- canvassing or whatever -- but unpaid internships in posh firms were always easily viable and no car repair was ever unaffordable (and p.s. the kewl car was a gift in the first place).


    Not that they didn't whine. Of course they did. They just never showed up in the plasma-sales lines.

    ReplyDelete
  130. cwaltz1:48 PM

    The whole entire thing was an exercise in lazy and if I were Visa, a company whose purpose is determining creditworthiness-or money experts, I'd have been ashamed to attach my name to it. It's like the higher ups at McD's got together after the strikes and decided that they could resolve all the complaining with a budget for the masses. Then when they got down to the nitty gritty they realized they couldn't and decided to bullshit their way through the exercise in a half ass manner. I don't know a single person who uses a budget that budgets food as a daily rather than monthly expense- hell the USDA prints what they consider a weekly cost to feed people is on their site. I also don't know a single responsible person who doesn't budget for regular expenditures like gas or car maintenance in their budgets. It's irresponsible. Why? Because budgets only work when you're honest about your expenses and spending. Seems to me the budget makers needed a class in how to budget.

    ReplyDelete
  131. cwaltz1:57 PM

    That's where workers need to assert themselves. You fill out an availability sheet and then enforce it(You need daytime help? Great. I'll be available for you between 6am-5pm You need a night shift? Fine I can work a 6pm-12am Don't bother to expect me to show up before or after the hours I say I can work. And yes my daughter let an employer go that persistently ignored her availability and my son had to have an uncomfortable conversation where he reminded them that he was hired for a specific shift) . My daughter and son both have worked 2 to 3 jobs at present and in the past and when the employers attempted to schedule them beyond what they were scheduled they spoke up. For $7.25 an hour an employer doesn't get to own your life.

    ReplyDelete
  132. montag22:14 PM

    That's why this whole exercise just adds insult to injury.

    ReplyDelete
  133. montag22:19 PM

    Being roller-coaster fans with an economic turn of mind....


    Being economic roller coaster fans with a sadistic turn of mind....

    ReplyDelete
  134. DocAmazing2:25 PM

    Let them eat cotton candy.


    Alternately:


    Let them barf cake.

    ReplyDelete
  135. TomParmenter2:25 PM

    "In Dixieland where I was born in, early on one frosty mornin'".


    Never happened says climatologist/chef/home economist.

    ReplyDelete
  136. DocAmazing2:30 PM

    No gold-chain-wearing rap star could ever hold a candle to Republican Donald Trump for pure, unfiltered tackiness.

    ReplyDelete
  137. DocAmazing2:33 PM

    Get the rest of the $7.25/hr workers on your shift to agree with you and stand together, and you're on to something.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Joe Vecchio2:48 PM

    I'm still trying to figure out where she gets $24,000 from. At $8 an hour your take home pay will be closer to $13,000 after taxes, even if you assume rent of $500 a month, that's about half of that gone already, and every $5 a day you spend on food is another $1,800. And keep in mind that unless you live on ramen and rice, $5 ain't very much, you couldn't even live on that using McD's Dollar Menu.

    ReplyDelete
  139. montag24:00 PM

    She's referring to the original income figure for two part-time jobs in the Ronald McDonald handy-dandy fuck-you budget, which was something like $23K and change. I guess she rounded up because employers are always doing that for her....

    ReplyDelete
  140. XeckyGilchrist4:45 PM

    I'm still trying to figure out where she gets $24,000 from.


    In her station in life, searching the couch cushions will do it.

    ReplyDelete
  141. ADHDJ5:08 PM

    Well, it's not going to stick it to the man or change anything.

    Larry Ellison makes $1 in salary... and $90M a year in stock options.

    Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, makes $2.5M in salary and another $40M in non-salary compensation: options, stock grants, use of free company shit, etc.

    http://graphics.wsj.com/ceo-pay-2013/#i[]=244&i[]=240&i[]=235&i[]=239&i[]=241&f=all&s[]=sal

    Some of that is not taxed at all, the rest of it is taxed at the long term capital gains rate. So that's what CEO's currently prefer.



    Rex Tillerson is just going to work for $1M in salary and $41.5M in other compensation instead.

    ReplyDelete
  142. LutherQBlissett5:39 PM

    Perhaps for her 2013 gift guide, she can helpfully include alongside the price how many McDs hours one would have to work to afford it.


    Although that does involve division.

    ReplyDelete
  143. redoubt5:41 PM

    Gastritis Broke My Thermomix

    ReplyDelete
  144. LutherQBlissett5:42 PM

    Duh. They're getting their free healthcare by lining up outside a stadium for 12 hours for one of those things where doctors offer pro bono checkups.

    Oh, I forgot, they're working 76 hour weeks where if the manager calls you in for a shift on short notice, you'd better be there fast.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Halloween_Jack5:54 PM

    This is horribly common corporate policy. Some bright-eyed son of a bitch at HQ believes that letting the proles have the leftovers will encourage deliberate overpreparation of food and cut into their profits, so they insist on the franchises throwing away enough food each to feed a family, every night. When I worked as a janitor at Target, not only were we forbidden from taking aluminum pop cans for recycling, but we couldn't even eat chocolate that had "expired." (Like most candy, chocolate really doesn't go bad, at least by the official expiration date, because of the sugar content.) Of course, in the rare job that did allow workers to have leftovers, we then had to not-literally-but-there-were-days-when-it-almost-came-to-that fight over the scraps, in the manner of peasants jousting over used trenchers.

    ReplyDelete
  146. Halloween_Jack5:57 PM

    Well, there's the sort of personal deficit that ends up being a benefit for a particular person, in that it's-a-feature-not-a-bug-especially-when-writing-for-Bloomberg kind of way.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Yeah, but you're a rare and endangered breed.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Spaghetti Lee5:59 PM

    Given McArdle's age, she "started out" in the mid-late 90s. The price of fucking gasoline on its own is enough to make any equivalency between $800 circa 1996 and $800 today not worth the trouble. The woman is a serial liar. I wouldn't trust her to work a lemonade stand without trying to cheat someone.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Sgaile-beairt6:10 PM

    ....jesus fuck....!!

    ReplyDelete
  150. Sgaile-beairt6:11 PM

    duplicate mulitple redundancy alert!!!

    ReplyDelete
  151. Your lack of reading comprehension? What a metaphor is? Oh, you got a headstart on mangling that one. The worst part is you trying to draw a fuckin' parralel between someone making an expression of honest disgust, like: "Fuck this world!" and people who would actually welcome a literal end to the world. Maybe you're just an innocent naif but I don't buy it for a second.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Let's start with you, then. Stop the piglet-in-the-woods-act.

    ReplyDelete
  153. I am cowed yet honored to bask in your glory.

    ReplyDelete
  154. Gromet6:59 PM

    Yeah, I don't know how you'd quantify/qualify extra-salary stuff, but seems you could make that part of the ratio, or of a different ratio -- for every 100 shares of stock CEO Rex gets, Hourly Joe gets 1 share. Would Rex work less hard? I don't know what motivates people at that level -- I'd think to some extent simple pride in kicking ass at running an empire, so he'd work just as effectively for $7 million as for $40 million. I know better what motives Hourly Joe -- if he had stock in the company, he'd take his responsibilities more seriously. Someone who really knows how the top tier is compensated would have to figure this out, and there will always be inequities, but you could tighten it. (Here's an example of inequity that McArdle is not considering with her Let Them Eat Cake budget advice: When I made $6/hr in a cafe, I was allowed to eat there at 30 percent off -- huzzah; one day some VPs visited from HQ and my boss told me to lay out a spread of food for them, gratis. Sure! Let the guys who make $90k/yr eat a free lunch, but charge their fellow employees making $12k. Meh, I didn't resent it too hard; I just resolved to steal as much food as I could from then on. #RobinHoodEthics #JeanValjean #Sorry)

    ReplyDelete
  155. Gromet7:15 PM

    Also, I should clarify, Robin Hood crack aside: I have no "stick it to the man" goals. I just want stability and peace for the long-term success of the USA. Which I think is best for the world, as I am an old-fashioned patriot. And a "we're all in this together" mentality comes sorta naturally to me. I do, however, sometimes resent it when I see that precept being trashed; I've met some verrrrry rich people and they are kind of fucked up in how they view the world which casts doubt on how universal my understanding of humanity is; and the rampant materialism that is sometimes celebrated as "the American way" strikes me as a rot we might be happier to shake off (though even there my concerns are not moral or spiritual but pragmatic: the more money that gets into any system, the more that system warps to please the people who stand to profit from it--which is a problem when we're talking about journalism, health care, voting rights, and war, to name a few).

    ReplyDelete
  156. Wait, that almost sounds like a union! Why would you defecate on the flag by suggesting suck anathema!

    ReplyDelete
  157. And way to flub it.

    ReplyDelete
  158. tigrismus7:58 PM

    IT'LL COST YOU.

    ReplyDelete
  159. Megs knows of which she speaks when talkin' 'bout the poors.

    Her recent column was lamenting about a "friend" who might have difficulty paying the gift taxes on a write-off of her student loans... of $650,000. So you know she's, as usual, jus' looking out for the little guy. "Poor" thing-having to absorb that gift tax hit from getting a write off of more than 27 years of "not princely" gross wages of people that work 70 hours a week!

    I generally take anything that propaganda organ says with a grain of pink Himalayan salt.

    ReplyDelete
  160. What's your example?

    ReplyDelete
  161. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBfeLdjNVKY

    ReplyDelete
  162. True, but that's not really what's up here.

    ReplyDelete
  163. r€nato9:26 PM

    I live in fucking Arizona, and even in fucking Arizona there are 3 months in which one needs to be able to afford heating.

    Is there ANY sort of capitalist exploitation which glibertarians won't defend?

    I hereby sentence Megan McArdle to spend one year working the grill at McDonald's,

    ReplyDelete
  164. billcinsd9:32 PM

    I'd maybe go with Sam Vimes' Boot's Theory of Economic Injustice, but they are more or less the same thing

    http://wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/index.php/Sam_Vimes_Theory_of_Economic_Injustice

    ReplyDelete
  165. Chocolate Covered Cotton4:15 AM

    I'm still holding out hope for a zombie apocalypse.

    (I am not actually hoping for a zombie apocalypse. I am making a dark joke using hyperbole to express my exasperation with the current socio-economic environment and my own lack of hope for imminent improvement.)

    ReplyDelete
  166. srinija roy4:26 AM

    i love McDonald's fast food

    ReplyDelete
  167. cambridgemac8:41 AM

    Facts are for libtards. Conservative "journalists" and "thinkers" don't need them.



    Oh, and giving free meals, country club memberships, and zero interest loans to wealthy predator capitalists - those aren't entitlements, nor do they corrupt the morals of the managerial class. But letting a youngster - or a SENIOR (a quarter of the MdDonalid's workers in my area) - eat unused food, now THAT encourages entitlement thinking. And moral corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  168. FlipYrWhig10:54 AM

    Propaganda organ failure.

    ReplyDelete
  169. Kathleen11:34 AM

    Shorter Meeeegan McCurdle: "Why, a family of 4 can live quite comfortably in a refrigerator box, especially if the children are 3 or 4 or younger, as they can hold their breath to make more room ((provided they aren't obese from living on junk food because their parents would rather buy beer than broccoli)".

    ReplyDelete
  170. cwaltz12:24 PM

    It's a round robin whine fest for the conservatives and libertarians and the typical game of move the goalpost. First they complain that the unemployed need to get a job, ANY job, just get off the government dole(because apparently they are unfamiliar with the concept that unemployment is an EARNED benefit.) The when people take "any job" then they complain about how unfair it is that these people dare to ask for enough to live off of without having to beg for government scraps. So they start whining that what these people need is an education. So then some of these people who don't make enough go out and get an education and end up racking up debt and then they whine about THAT too. "No one told you to go into debt." Uh yeah you did when you told someone that in order to earn an actual living they'd need to get an education you libertarian and conservative jackasses.

    ReplyDelete
  171. PulletSurprise1:58 PM

    Wealthy daddy = the original social safety net.

    ReplyDelete
  172. reallyaimai5:05 PM

    The lucky duckies! Wi wish someone would give *me* free healthcare!

    ReplyDelete
  173. KatWillow5:44 PM

    She wouldn't last 1 hour there. Remember, she has asthma (and smokes). True story: I only lasted 1 shift at Burger King, and I was young & healthy, used to physical labor.

    ReplyDelete
  174. KatWillow5:46 PM

    But could they afford Scotchguard to weather-proof the box? Probably not, and it would get all soggy in the rain. Arglebargle would say they ought to have put plastic trash bags over the box.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Magatha6:46 PM

    And let's not even broach the subject of dental care. Most folks I know who are low-income to moderate income either don't have dental insurance, or get limited benefits from their plans. And yet neglecting dental care can have make you terribly vulnerable to more systemic illnesses, and pain from untended dental problems cuts into productivity (plus it hurts like fuck and that counts for something even if you are not McMegan), and guess what it also does? Lack of dental care eventually shows up when you open your mouth, and missing, discolored, and otherwise unhealthy dentition stigmatizes a person so profoundly that you can kiss (or wave) most of your upward mobility dreams good-bye.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Kathleen7:16 PM

    I respectfully disagree. McCurdle would consider the rain "plumbing" (running water and all, you see). She would continue, "Leaks are not a big deal at all. When I was staying at the Ritz Carlton a small leak developed in the bathroom but a guy who looked not American (unlike the guy I always use) fixed it quickly."

    ReplyDelete
  177. Goodjoke . Another Horse meat recall ... the minium payment does not get increase who eat horse meat teasing.

    ReplyDelete
  178. Goodjoke : of Right Wing politics. Which GOP politican may effect him to run for 2016 as GOP forcing him to run for president that Chris Christie. I apologize. As some right winger say does eat too much fast food only linked teasing..

    ReplyDelete
  179. Sartur11:24 PM

    This is what these sociopaths in the Republican party want to cut. Bear in mind that you need a qualifying child to get any real money from the EITC; adults can receive the credit but the maximum for 2012 was $475.00. How do I know this?

    Ten Minute Pages
    Gsniper
    Google Sniper
    Gsniper
    Google Sniper
    Google Sniper
    lose butt fat
    lose butt fat
    Cedar Finance
    Cedar Finance
    Binary Trade
    Binary Broker

    ReplyDelete
  180. JennOfArk11:39 PM

    Make that "short-fingered vulgarian" Republican Donald Trump.
    (I'm of the firm opinion that "Donald Trump" should always be preceded by "short-fingered vulgarian." Just one of the gifts bestowed upon us by the late, great, Spy magazine.)

    ReplyDelete
  181. whetstone5:32 PM

    Holy moses.

    The economic elite used to just buy more of the things we all enjoyed.
    Now they have access to a different set of experiences entirely. No,
    that’s not quite true -- of course the rich used to be able to afford
    better vacations and nicer cars. But increasingly they’re enjoying an
    exclusive version of the things we all do -- right there in front of us,
    where we can resent them for it.


    "I grew up rich, in New York, but I wasn't aware of the deleterious effects of income inequality until I didn't buy a 'Quick Queue' pass at Busch Gardens."

    ReplyDelete
  182. frightwig10:02 PM

    Where did she get the idea that hourly workers at McDonald's are taking home $24,000 a year from the job?



    At $8.25/hr, if your employer will give you 40 hours a week, you'll get paid $16,500, pre-tax, after 50 weeks. In my experience, restaurant managers try to schedule workers for 35 hours or less, because they want to avoid paying overtime. To get to $24,000 at minimum wage, you'd either have to convince the manager to give you 12 hours of overtime each week (good luck), or you're working two jobs at about 60 hours a week.

    ReplyDelete
  183. Nice post. Thanks for sharing!

    microsoft ftp server

    ReplyDelete
  184. edward10:01 AM

    Wonderful site! The business can be adoring that!! Is going to be rear afterwards for more information. seeking additional changes.

    best dentures and partials chicago

    New denture repair Chicago

    ReplyDelete